tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3353766970666257124.post5331245487551836344..comments2023-11-02T02:10:26.159-07:00Comments on My Global Eye: A Kook's Tour of St. Paul's ArtDr. Patrick D. Hazardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14249428526632811517noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3353766970666257124.post-47008367797458650032010-05-17T11:49:37.907-07:002010-05-17T11:49:37.907-07:00Men who love women and their bodies we will always...<i>Men who love women and their bodies we will always have with us, despite temporary aberrations like Andrea Dworkin and her fear-of-fucking cadre. ("Thou shalt not penetrate me," Ms. Dworkin moans, abusing herself selfishly.) <br /><br /> To prick her illusion, she should gaze at GL's "Dynamo Mother" (1933), which is all vulva, an expressionist romp over the woman's greatest blessing to man's kind: her capacity to nurture a fetus to term.</i><br /><br />And you appear to be all dickhead, the white man's unkindest manifestation of P.R.I.C.K.dom. (See my blog's glossary for the meaning of the acronym.)<br /><br />You're silly description of Andrea Dworkin's work and perspective comes from what readings and interpretations of her own writings? Are they your own? Or do you satisfy your intellectual lack-of-curiosities by only skimming secondary sources? You really come across as extremely ignorant, the way people in the U.S. do who spout off what they heard on Fox News as Gospel Truth. The way perpetually hungry consumers of pornography do when describing what feminist antipornography activists allegedly did in the 1980s to try and "censor" pornographers. (As if.)<br /><br />Are you trying to sound so ignorant? Or do you usually only have crickets chirping in lieu of readers to call you on the ridiculous stuff you publicly say? Oh, yes, you do admit this is "a kook's tour". You've certainly got that part right.<br /><br />Do you also ridicule Foucault, Chomsky, and Churchill for their philosophical-political views--and in such a sloppy manner? Or do you just make a point to focus in an inanely critical way on feminists whose work you either haven't read at all, or don't or can't comprehend because of your own intellectual ineptitude?<br /><br />Can you summarize what the major points of analysis are by Dworkin of James Baldwin's novels and non-fiction essays in the "Communion" chapter of Intercourse, for example? (I doubt it, but I thought I'd at least offer you an opportunity to show that you are capable of reading and accurately assessing the meaning of her work.)Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3353766970666257124.post-54858902344271049402010-05-17T09:25:29.536-07:002010-05-17T09:25:29.536-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.com